How it works

64 Personality Test places you on six scales using statements from the International Personality Item Pool, a public research inventory. Your answers are compared with more than 135,000 people who answered the same statements.

What it measures

The test places you on six scales: where your energy comes from, how you take in ideas, what weighs most when you decide, how you approach plans, how you handle pressure and whether you cope with others or on your own.

Each scale has two poles, and neither is better. Your letter is the pole you lean toward.

People: Outgoing (E) or Reserved (I)

The People scale measures where your energy comes from. Outgoing people get energy from people and activity and often think out loud. Reserved people recharge on their own and prefer a few close conversations to a crowd. Neither pole is a skill level: a Reserved person can be good company, and an Outgoing one can enjoy a quiet evening. Research ties this scale to extraversion.

Attention: Intuitive (N) or Hands-on (S)

The Attention scale measures what you notice first when you take something in. Intuitive people are drawn to ideas, patterns and what could be. Hands-on people trust what is concrete and proven, and like ideas that work in practice. Both get to the whole picture; the scale says where they start. Research ties it to openness to experience.

Decisions: Head (T) or Heart (F)

The Decisions scale measures what weighs most when you choose. For Head people, the logic of the problem weighs most. For Heart people, how others will feel weighs heavily. Head does not mean cold and Heart does not mean soft: everyone uses both, and the letter says which one usually wins a close call. Research ties it to agreeableness.

Plans: Planned (J) or Flexible (P)

The Plans scale measures how you approach what is ahead. Planned people like a plan, finish what they start and keep things in order. Flexible people keep their options open and handle things as they come. It is a preference, not an ability: a Flexible person can meet a deadline, and a Planned one can improvise when the plan breaks. Research ties it to conscientiousness.

Pressure: Steady (A) or Sensitive (T)

The Pressure scale measures how strongly stress and setbacks reach you. For Steady people, things take longer to arrive, and pressure rarely knocks them off balance. For Sensitive people, things arrive fast and fully; they notice what could go wrong, which keeps them alert. The MBTI has no such scale. It uses IPIP-NEO statements on the trait the Big Five calls neuroticism, with pole names chosen so that neither end reads as a flaw.

Support: Collaborative (C) or Self-reliant (S)

The Support scale measures whether you lean on others or handle things yourself. Collaborative people think and recover best with people around them. Self-reliant people carry things themselves and work them out before involving anyone. The MBTI has no such scale either. It combines five IPIP-HEXACO statements with seven new ones, is still being calibrated, and has a moderate link with how strongly pressure reaches you.

How it relates to the MBTI

The MBTI sorts people on four scales. Research comparing it with the Big Five, the most studied model of personality, found that each MBTI scale lines up with one Big Five trait: E/I with extraversion, S/N with openness, T/F with agreeableness and J/P with conscientiousness (McCrae and Costa, 1989).

This test measures the four letters with Big Five statements, then adds two scales the MBTI does not have: how steady you stay under pressure, and whether you lean on others or handle things yourself. That makes six letters and 64 types.

Personality types in four groups

The two middle letters sort the 16 personality types into four groups of four. Every personality type in a group shares where it starts and how it decides.

The Mapmakers (NT)

The Mapmakers are the Intuitive, Head types: INTJ, INTP, ENTJ and ENTP. They start from ideas and patterns and decide by the logic of the problem.

The Gardeners (NF)

The Gardeners are the Intuitive, Heart types: INFJ, INFP, ENFJ and ENFP. They start from ideas and possibilities and weigh how people will feel.

The Keepers (SF)

The Keepers are the Hands-on, Heart types: ISFJ, ESFJ, ISFP and ESFP. They trust what is concrete and proven and weigh how people will feel.

The Builders (ST)

The Builders are the Hands-on, Head types: ISTJ, ESTJ, ISTP and ESTP. They trust what is concrete and proven and decide by the logic of the problem.

The 16 personality types at a glance

Each personality type splits into four variants by the last two letters.

Personality typeNameGroup
INTJThe NavigatorThe Mapmakers
INTPThe AlchemistThe Mapmakers
ENTJThe StrategistThe Mapmakers
ENTPThe SparkThe Mapmakers
INFJThe LighthouseThe Gardeners
INFPThe PoetThe Gardeners
ENFJThe GuideThe Gardeners
ENFPThe FireflyThe Gardeners
ISTJThe AnchorThe Builders
ISFJThe ConfidantThe Keepers
ESTJThe ConductorThe Builders
ESFJThe HearthThe Keepers
ISTPThe ClimberThe Builders
ISFPThe ArtistThe Keepers
ESTPThe PilotThe Builders
ESFPThe BonfireThe Keepers

Where the statements come from

65 of the 72 statements come from the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP), a public collection of more than 3,000 statements started by Lewis R. Goldberg at the Oregon Research Institute and used in research for over 25 years.

For each of the first five scales, we started from the 300-statement IPIP-NEO inventory and kept the 12 statements that agreed best with the rest of their scale across more than 135,000 real answer sheets. The sixth scale combines five IPIP-HEXACO statements with seven new ones, which are still being calibrated.

Who you are compared with

Your score on each scale is compared with a reference group of more than 135,000 people who took the IPIP-NEO online and shared their answers for research (Johnson's IPIP-NEO data, Open Science Framework). Only complete answer sheets from people aged 16 or over were kept, with duplicates removed.

The group leans young (median age 22) and is 58% women. If you are much older, your percentiles compare you with a younger crowd.

How a letter is decided

Your answers on each scale are compared with the reference group. The letter says which side of the middle you landed on.

Answers carry some noise, so each scale also shows the range you would likely land in if you took the test again.

How often a retake agrees

We checked this on 60,000 real answer sheets. The statements for each scale were split into two equivalent sets, and we counted how often the same person landed on the same side in both.

With 12 statements per scale and five answer options, the estimate is about 81% for each letter. Formats common on free MBTI sites did worse, even when built from the same research statements: five yes-or-no questions per letter came out at about 65%, two questions per letter at about 62%.

Both sets were answered in one sitting, so a real retake weeks later agrees somewhat less. That is why close calls are shown as in-between instead of forced: with that rule, about 7 in 10 people would see none of their clear letters flip to the opposite side.

Close calls

When a scale lands near the middle, the test asks a few more statements on that scale before deciding. If it is still close, the result says you are in between instead of forcing a side.

What it is not

This is a tool for self-understanding. It is not a clinical assessment and should not be used for hiring or diagnosis.

It is an independent project, not affiliated with The Myers-Briggs Company or 16Personalities.

Sources

  1. Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., et al. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
  2. Johnson, J. A. (2014). Measuring thirty facets of the Five Factor Model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 78–89. doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.003
  3. Johnson's IPIP-NEO data repository. Open Science Framework. osf.io/tbmh5/
  4. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57, 17–40. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00759.x
  5. Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The IPIP-HEXACO scales: An alternative, public-domain measure of the personality constructs in the HEXACO model. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1515–1526. doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.027
  6. International Personality Item Pool. Oregon Research Institute. ipip.ori.org/

Take the test